Ready to Get Your Money Back From the IRS?
Bring us up to 3 years of past taxes and we’ll find ways to save you money, when we do we’ll help you file to get your money back from the IRS.
Prediction Markets Are Becoming a Tax Issue—Here's Why It Matters
Prediction markets are expanding rapidly, drawing interest from investors, cryptocurrency enthusiasts, and high-net-worth individuals seeking alternative ways to engage with financial markets. Platforms like Kalshi allow participants to trade contracts based on the likelihood of future events. While initial attention focused on how these markets operate, a critical secondary concern is now taking center stage: the tax implications. Recent legislative actions in North Carolina show that state governments are designing tax frameworks for these platforms. While this legislation impacts operators rather than individual traders, it signals a broader shift. Regulators increasingly view prediction markets as permanent financial fixtures, meaning that reporting requirements and compliance rules will continue to evolve. Active traders must begin planning now.
Understanding Prediction Markets
Unlike traditional stock market or mutual fund investments, prediction markets let participants trade contracts tied directly to future occurrences. The value of these contracts shifts based on the probability of a specific outcome.
These contracts typically center on macroeconomic, political, or policy questions, such as:
- Will the Federal Reserve adjust interest rates this year?
- Will inflation surpass a specific percentage?
- Will Congress pass a particular bill?
- Will a designated economic indicator hit a certain threshold?
Although these platforms look similar to sportsbooks on the surface, they carry a distinct legal classification. Many prediction markets operate under the oversight of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the agency regulating U.S. derivatives. The CFTC treats these event contracts as financial instruments rather than wagering products—a critical distinction that shapes their regulatory and tax future.
Why North Carolina's Legislative Move Matters
North Carolina recently passed a law applying a 6% tax to the net trading fee revenue that prediction-market operators generate within the state. This same bill also increased the state's tax on sports wagering.
The real significance of this law extends beyond a simple revenue measure. North Carolina deliberately distinguished federally regulated prediction markets from traditional sports gambling. By recognizing the CFTC's regulatory framework, the state validated event contracts as a separate class of financial transactions.
For individual retail investors, this does not create a direct state-level tax on your trades. However, it demonstrates that lawmakers are establishing specialized tax systems for prediction markets. When governments build industry-specific frameworks, detailed guidelines for individual taxpayers generally follow.
The Federal Regulatory Framework Takes Shape
Federal agencies are actively defining how these platforms operate. The CFTC maintains that federally regulated event markets belong under its oversight rather than state-level gaming laws. This position has been tested in recent litigation where the agency defended its jurisdiction against state-level regulatory attempts.
While these legal battles primarily impact platform operators, they confirm that prediction markets are becoming a structured component of the broader U.S. financial system. As federal recognition solidifies, taxpayers should prepare for more formal tax guidance and reporting standards.
How Are Prediction Market Earnings Taxed?
Currently, the IRS has not issued comprehensive guidance specifically addressing prediction market transactions. In the absence of direct rules, tax professionals evaluate three potential treatment frameworks under current law.
First, transactions could be categorized as gambling income. Under this approach, net winnings are treated as ordinary income and taxed at your marginal rate. Losses can only offset winnings if you itemize deductions, and current law limits deductions for gambling losses to 90% of those losses. This limitation can sometimes create taxable income even if you only broke even over the year.
Second, contracts could be treated as capital assets. This would mean reporting individual gains and losses on Form 8949, similar to other property transactions. Net capital losses would offset capital gains, with up to $3,000 allowed to offset ordinary income annually.
Third, certain contracts traded on CFTC-designated contract markets might qualify for Section 1256 treatment. If eligible, gains and losses would receive a favorable split of 60% long-term and 40% short-term capital gains, regardless of how long the contracts were held.
Because no single standard has been established by the IRS, there is no universal reporting method that applies to every trader.
Why Conservative Tax Reporting Is the Safest Approach
Given the lack of definitive IRS guidelines, many tax professionals recommend a conservative reporting approach. Treating prediction market winnings as ordinary income represents the most audit-resistant stance because it applies the least favorable tax rate. While this may mean paying more tax upfront, it significantly reduces the likelihood of underreporting disputes with the IRS.
A conservative position also shields you from potential accuracy-related penalties if the IRS later establishes a strict reporting standard. If the IRS eventually issues rules that are more favorable to taxpayers, you can file an amended return to claim a refund. Generally, you have three years from the filing date or two years from the payment date (whichever is later) to amend your return. For many traders, avoiding future interest, penalties, and audits is worth the conservative approach today.
Strategic Questions for Event Contract Traders
As prediction markets grow in popularity, tax compliance challenges naturally follow. Investors should proactively ask themselves several questions before the end of the tax year:
- How should my specific gains and losses be reported?
- Which of the potential tax treatments applies to my unique transactions?
- Will reporting rules shift in the near future?
- What documentation must I keep to support my return?
- Will exchanges begin reporting trade details directly to the IRS?
- How will my home state tax these transactions?
Addressing these issues early allows you to build a cohesive plan rather than reacting during tax season.
Parallel Lessons from Cryptocurrency Regulation
Traders who participated in the early days of digital assets will recognize this regulatory pattern. When cryptocurrency first emerged, tax guidance was minimal, and many assumed the IRS would focus on it. Eventually, the IRS ramped up enforcement, redesigned tax forms, and implemented strict disclosure and reporting requirements.
While prediction markets are distinct from cryptocurrency and will not necessarily be governed in the exact same manner, both represent rapid financial innovations that outpaced tax law. As these platforms grow, we anticipate expanded information reporting, new IRS guidelines, and specialized state rules.
Why Diligent Recordkeeping Is Essential
Regardless of how future regulations shape up, organized documentation is your best defense. If you actively trade event contracts, you must systematically track your activity. Ensure you preserve:
- Trade confirmation receipts
- Purchase and settlement dates
- Precise contract values
- Associated trading fees
- Monthly or annual account statements
- Any annual tax documents provided by platforms
Maintaining these records simplifies tax preparation, allows us to analyze planning opportunities, and provides necessary support if the IRS questions your return.
Expect More States to Take Action
North Carolina is the first of many states likely to address this sector. As these platforms expand, more state governments will evaluate how to tax operator revenue and fit event contracts into their existing tax structures. Some states will likely copy North Carolina's model by taxing operators while acknowledging CFTC regulations, while others might pursue stricter local rules or wait for federal clarification. Regardless of the path, prediction markets are transitioning from a niche trend into a mainstream financial sector, and state tax policies are adjusting accordingly.
Proactive Planning Offers the Best Protection
Waiting until after the tax year ends to think about your transactions limits your options. For prediction market traders, the crucial decision is how you choose to report your gains and losses under current ambiguous rules. Choosing a defensible reporting position and backing it up with complete documentation is just as vital as calculating the numbers. A proactive review before filing helps identify potential reporting issues and prepares you for future regulatory changes.
Navigating Your Prediction Market Tax Strategy
Prediction markets are successfully transitioning from emerging financial experiments to recognized, regulated investment options. North Carolina's recent legislation illustrates that governments are actively constructing targeted tax policies for this sector. In the absence of clear federal guidance, investors must make deliberate, informed reporting decisions based on current tax laws.
If you are actively trading event contracts, let's review your activity now. We can help you navigate the evolving federal and state rules, establish a defensible tax strategy, and protect your financial interests. Reach out to our firm today to schedule a consultation.
Want our best tax and accounting tips and insights delivered to your inbox?
Sign up for our newsletter.
I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By
clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the
and
.
 |  |  |  |  |
Get in touch
See how we can help you today!
4600 Roseville Road, Suite 150
North Highlands, California 95660
North Highlands, California 95660
916) 974-9399